ScholarMark · Pre-submission infrastructure

The Pre-Submission Research Bridge for Academic Publishing.

Book Institutional Demo

Free to start · No credit card · Your manuscript never leaves your control

scholarmark.decentrasec.com/app/papers
Hover to play

Submit · Audit · Seal

Run a structural AI audit, secure your IP with Proof of Discovery, and route to Tier-1 reviewers — before you ever hit submit.

The pre-submission bridge for academic publishing. Deploy a structural AI audit, mathematically secure your IP with Proof of Discovery, and route to verified Tier-1 reviewers through the GEAR Network — before formal journal submission.

500+ Researchers Onboarded (Beta Users across MUET pilot + early access signups)

Award & Hackathon Winner

Proof of Discovery seals issued

AI Detection Accuracy on formatting and structural error identification (internal benchmark)

Reduction in Structural Errors detected pre-submission (MUET pilot data, N=47 papers)

Improvement in reviewer-rated paper quality scores (pre vs. post AI-check)

Across Pakistan's research ecosystem

Built alongside leading institutions.

From MUET to the national HEC framework, ScholarMark is built with the universities and bodies shaping the country's research output.

HEC
LUMS
MOITT
MUET
NICH
UET
FAST
Karachi
HEC
LUMS
MOITT
MUET
NICH
UET
FAST
Karachi
Karachi
FAST
UET
NICH
MUET
MOITT
LUMS
HEC
Karachi
FAST
UET
NICH
MUET
MOITT
LUMS
HEC
Not a shadow operation

Backed by national technology leaders & R&D hubs.

Integrated with and trusted by Pakistan's national technology incubation and R&D bodies — including the Ignite National Technology Fund, the Ministry of IT & Telecom, and the National Incubation Center.

80%

average error reduction measured across the live MUET institutional pilot — Mehran University of Engineering & Technology (N=47 manuscripts).

Ignite National Technology Fund
Ministry of IT & Telecom
National Incubation Center
LMKT
PTCL
The problem

A 50-year-old pipeline still governs 2026 publishing.

Universities inherit a framework designed in the 1970s — manual gates, fragmented reviewer networks, and zero pre-submission integrity layers. It fails on two structural fronts: the non-intellectual bottleneck that desk-rejects 70% of papers, and the 6-to-12 month dead zone every rejection creates.

The loyalty trap

Loyalty isn't rewarded — it's queued.

High Impact Factor journals force thoroughly reviewed papers into endless queues. A contributor who has written for a journal for 10+ years — since its I.F. was a mere 0.X — is treated like an outsider the moment that journal gains prominence.

The exposure gap

Your research sits unprotected for 12 months.

High risk
12 months exposed
Discovery · Day 0Publication · 12 mo

Where is your data right now? Your research…

Sits unprotected for 12+ months on average in a publishing queue of a Top Journal.

Sits unprotected for a long time in an unencrypted public cloud storage environment.

Stays inside a storage drive on an external reviewer's local machine with zero corporate oversight.

Sits unprotected in a publishing queue where it risks being crawled and analyzed by unauthorized AI tools.

The gap between when you discover something and when it is formally published — fully written, but legally unprotected and open to scooping or authorship disputes. Today, the most dangerous window in your research career.

01

Structural desk rejection

Over 70% of papers are rejected at the editorial desk for non-intellectual errors — formatting deviations, citation anomalies, protocol failures. Not bad science; broken structure.

Solved by AI Integrity Layer

~70%

desk-rejected

02

IP exposed during the draft stage

With only a manual paper trail as evidence, early-stage ideas can be poached during the vulnerable pre-review window — with no mathematical proof of priority.

Solved by Integritas Vault (POD)

No proof

of priority

03

Fragmented, overburdened reviewer networks

Legacy peer networks are manual and overloaded, pushing every paper into a 6-to-12-month queue before a single expert opinion ever arrives.

Solved by The GEAR Network

6–12mo

dead zone

The pre-submission bridge

Four moves across the bridge, before you submit.

The path a draft takes from private upload to verified evaluation — secured, audited, and reviewed before it ever reaches a formal journal.

  1. 01

    Deploy

    Upload your draft

    The manuscript enters a non-public vault — never an open ledger, never a public disclosure.

  2. 02

    Audit

    Run the AI validation

    Mathematical validation against your institutional and target-journal ruleset clears structural errors before any human sees it.

  3. 03

    Evaluate

    Route to the GEAR Network

    Match with verified Tier-1 reviewers for uncorrupted, fast evaluation before formal journal submission.

  4. 04

    Secure

    Lock your Integritas seal

    An immutable mathematical hash anchors the work to your identity — Proof of Discovery, established without public disclosure.

The architecture

Three architectural layers. One pre-submission bridge.

ScholarMark replaces a 50-year-old pipeline with unified infrastructure: an AI Integrity Layer for structural compliance, the Integritas Vault for IP sovereignty, and the GEAR Network for verified peer evaluation — deployed before formal journal submission.

Integrity audit

Passed
92/100
8 pts

Readiness score

  • Document structure extracted
  • Citation integrity verified
  • Journal format compliant
  • PII scan clean
01

Layer 01 · AI Integrity Layer

Structural compliance engine

Drive structural desk rejection toward zero.

Automated pre-submission parsing. Before any human editor or reviewer touches the manuscript, the engine audits your draft against the exact ruleset configured by your university's research office or the target journal — flagging the non-intellectual errors that trigger most desk rejections.

  • Audits against institutional and target-journal rulesets
  • Flags IEEE / APA / Harvard formatting deviations
  • Detects citation gaps and self-cite patterns
  • Drops the structural desk rejection rate toward zero

Proof of Discovery

Integritas Vault · POD

Anchored

Distributed Consensus Mechanisms in Federated Learning Networks

Dr. Hina Raza · MUET

Discovery audit trail

v314 Jun 20260x3a7f…b4e2f1
v202 May 20260x9c1d…77a0e3
v118 Mar 20260x5e82…1fb9c4
02

Layer 02 · Integritas Vault & POD

IP sovereignty

Mathematically secured Proof of Discovery.

When a draft is uploaded, the infrastructure generates an immutable mathematical hash anchored to your identity inside a non-public vault. This is cryptographic Proof of Discovery: undeniable global prior art and First-to-Invent verification — established without public disclosure, so ideas cannot be poached during the vulnerable pre-review draft stage.

  • Immutable mathematical hash anchored to your identity
  • Held in a non-public vault — never a public disclosure
  • Establishes global prior art and First-to-Invent status
  • Protects early-stage concepts during the draft stage

Independent Reviews

With author permission

Shared for fast publication in high-impact-factor journals & conference proceedings.

1,240+

Successful reviews

42

Top reviewers

Names of top reviewers

KM

Dr. K. Memon

Machine Learning · 128 reviews

94% on-time
RN

Prof. R. Naqvi

Distributed Systems · 96 reviews

89% on-time
ML

Dr. M. Lashari

Computer Vision · 73 reviews

92% on-time

Thank you for your trust — leave the rest to us.

03

Layer 03 · The GEAR Network

Verified peer evaluation marketplace

Uncorrupted Tier-1 evaluation, before formal routing.

A double-blind, decentralized marketplace connecting authors to verified Tier-1 expert reviewers and PhD holders. GEAR eliminates the fragmentation of legacy peer networks, running on data-driven, machine-learning field matching and clear SLAs to deliver fast, uncorrupted evaluation before your paper is ever routed to a formal journal.

  • Verified Tier-1 reviewers and PhD holders
  • Double-blind, decentralized routing
  • Machine-learning field matching with clear SLAs
  • Uncorrupted evaluation before formal journal routing
Legacy vs infrastructure

The legacy framework against the integrated pipeline.

Five structural metrics. One pipeline designed in the 1970s, one deployed as infrastructure for 2026.

Average pre-review wait time

Legacy

6 to 12 months

ScholarMark

Near-instant automated structural audit

Desk rejection rate (structural)

Legacy

~70% globally

ScholarMark

Minimized via pre-submission ruleset engine

Early-stage IP protection

Legacy

Vulnerable — manual paper trail only

ScholarMark

Mathematically secured Proof of Discovery (POD)

Reviewer network routing

Legacy

Fragmented, manual & overburdened

ScholarMark

Verified GEAR marketplace optimization

Institutional oversight

Legacy

Blind to drafts until journal submission

ScholarMark

Real-time management console

Institutional validation

Meeting researchers where they work.

MoU signings, national briefings, campus sessions, and live security showcases — real rooms, real institutions, real researchers.

Pakistan IT Minister

Federal IT leadership
DecentraSec team meeting Pakistan's Federal IT Minister

Meeting with Pakistan's Federal Ministry of IT & Telecom.

DecentraSec leadership with Pakistan's IT Minister
Built for both sides of the bridge

One platform. Two missions.

For individual researchers

Protect your work today.

Secure your IP and clear the structural hurdles before you ever hit submit.

  • Secure unpublished IP with Proof of Discovery.
  • Clear structural desk rejection before you submit.
  • Mathematically verify prior art and First-to-Invent status.

For institutions &

Protect your university's prestige.

Equip your faculty and safeguard your institution's research output at scale.

  • Deploy a real-time research management console.
  • Compress faculty publication timelines.
  • Protect institutional prestige and data sovereignty.
Request Institutional Pilot
Voices from the pilot

Trusted by the researchers using it.

Researchers, reviewers, and research offices across our institutional pilot.

The AI readiness check flagged three missing DOIs and a PII leak in my dataset before I ever submitted. Months of desk-rejection avoided.
SQ

Dr. Sana Qureshi

Computer Science, MUET

For the first time I can prove exactly when I documented my method. The POD seal gave us priority when a competing group published a similar approach.
IS

Prof. Imran Shaikh

Electrical Engineering, MUET

Reviewing used to be unpaid, invisible work. With escrow my fee is released the moment I deliver, not six months later.
AK

Dr. Ayesha Khan

Reviewer · NED University

Our department runs every pre-submission draft through ScholarMark now. Fewer rejections, faster timelines, and a clean audit trail for the research office.
BA

Prof. Bilal Ahmed

Mechanical Engineering, UET Lahore

I sealed my dataset the night before a conference deadline. Knowing the timestamp is immutable took a real weight off.
HR

Dr. Hina Raza

Data Science, MUET

The AI readiness check flagged three missing DOIs and a PII leak in my dataset before I ever submitted. Months of desk-rejection avoided.
SQ

Dr. Sana Qureshi

Computer Science, MUET

For the first time I can prove exactly when I documented my method. The POD seal gave us priority when a competing group published a similar approach.
IS

Prof. Imran Shaikh

Electrical Engineering, MUET

Reviewing used to be unpaid, invisible work. With escrow my fee is released the moment I deliver, not six months later.
AK

Dr. Ayesha Khan

Reviewer · NED University

Our department runs every pre-submission draft through ScholarMark now. Fewer rejections, faster timelines, and a clean audit trail for the research office.
BA

Prof. Bilal Ahmed

Mechanical Engineering, UET Lahore

I sealed my dataset the night before a conference deadline. Knowing the timestamp is immutable took a real weight off.
HR

Dr. Hina Raza

Data Science, MUET

I accept far more review requests now. Field-matched routing means the papers actually fit my expertise, and I get paid fairly.
OF

Dr. Omar Farooq

Reviewer · FAST NUCES

Our faculty's publication timelines dropped noticeably. The pre-submission audit removes the back-and-forth that used to cost us months.
NS

Prof. Nadia Siddiqui

Research Office Director, MUET

The format-compliance pass catches the small structural issues reviewers used to reject us for. My last two papers cleared desk review first time.
KM

Dr. Kamran Memon

Machine Learning, MUET

We now cite the Proof-of-Discovery seal in grant applications as evidence of prior art. Reviewers take the timestamp seriously.
RA

Dr. Rabia Aslam

Biotechnology, NUST

Originality scoring before submission saved a student from an accidental overlap they hadn't noticed. That alone earned its place in our workflow.
TM

Prof. Tariq Mahmood

Computer Science, COMSATS

I accept far more review requests now. Field-matched routing means the papers actually fit my expertise, and I get paid fairly.
OF

Dr. Omar Farooq

Reviewer · FAST NUCES

Our faculty's publication timelines dropped noticeably. The pre-submission audit removes the back-and-forth that used to cost us months.
NS

Prof. Nadia Siddiqui

Research Office Director, MUET

The format-compliance pass catches the small structural issues reviewers used to reject us for. My last two papers cleared desk review first time.
KM

Dr. Kamran Memon

Machine Learning, MUET

We now cite the Proof-of-Discovery seal in grant applications as evidence of prior art. Reviewers take the timestamp seriously.
RA

Dr. Rabia Aslam

Biotechnology, NUST

Originality scoring before submission saved a student from an accidental overlap they hadn't noticed. That alone earned its place in our workflow.
TM

Prof. Tariq Mahmood

Computer Science, COMSATS

Questions, answered

Frequently asked questions.

Still have questions?

Our team answers within one business day.

Talk to us

The system doesn't need disrupting.
It needs a bridge.

Join 500+ researchers already securing their work in our beta infrastructure.

Verify a seal

Free to start · No credit card · Your manuscript never leaves your control